Illustration: Online content and media regulation in Saudi Arabia. Alt text provided for accessibility.

The General Authority of Media Regulation (GAMR) has referred six individuals to the Public Prosecution for publishing online content deemed to incite public opinion — an offence under Article 6 of the Anti‑Cybercrime Law carrying penalties of up to 5 years’ imprisonment and fines up to SR3 million.

What happened?

The General Authority of Media Regulation (GAMR) announced that six people have been referred to the Public Prosecution after publishing online material that the authority judged to be capable of inciting public opinion. Prosecutors have opened investigations and asked the competent court to apply appropriate penalties where violations are confirmed.

Legal basis: Article 6 of the Anti‑Cybercrime Law

GAMR cited Article 6, paragraph 1 of the Anti‑Cybercrime Law, which criminalises producing, preparing, transmitting or storing online material that harms public order, religious values, public morals or the sanctity of private life. Convictions can draw up to 5 years in prison, a fine of up to SR3 million, or both.

Why GAMR intervened

• Authorities considered the content to threaten public order or violate media rules and standards.

• GAMR emphasised that media content which prejudices public order or breaches regulations will face decisive action.

• The referral reflects an intensified regulatory approach to policing online speech and content in the Kingdom.

Implications for content creators and the public

The case underscores a strict enforcement environment: individuals and content creators should be mindful of what they publish online. The Anti‑Cybercrime Law’s broad language covering "public order", "religious values" and "public morals" means many forms of expression could be scrutinised and, if judged unlawful, prosecuted.

Context: broader scope of the Anti‑Cybercrime Law

The Anti‑Cybercrime Law covers a wide set of offences beyond content-related crimes, including unauthorised access, hacking, and data tampering. Rights groups have raised concerns about the law’s vague terms and the scope of enforcement, which could have chilling effects on free expression and journalism.

Conclusion

The referral of six people to the Public Prosecution under Article 6 highlights Saudi Arabia’s determination to regulate and, where it deems necessary, punish online speech that it considers harmful to public order or morals. Anyone posting or sharing content within the Kingdom — nationals and expatriates alike — should be aware of the strict legal environment and potential legal consequences.